Here’s the thing, only one of the companies
can be right, or both are wrong.
Company A, says that their knives are sharp enough to cut through most anything.
Company B, says their cutting board resists
scratches and marks and will not be harmed by knives.
***
You’ve walked straight into the
church of Marketing Theology, where “sharp enough” and “will not be harmed” are
both technically true and spiritually ridiculous.
A few things going on here:
·
Weasel words everywhere:
o
“Sharp enough to cut through most anything” = not a promise, it’s a vibe. “Most
anything” is undefined. Bread? Rope? Aluminum can? A brick? They don’t say.
o
“Will not be harmed by knives” = also vague. Which knives? Under what
force? For how long? “Resists scratches” is not “cannot be scratched.”
·
Both can be “right” by shrinking reality:
o
The knife
company imagines soft, everyday materials and dramatic infomercial stunts.
o
The cutting
board company imagines normal kitchen use, not someone trying to carve their
logo into it with a chisel.
o
Each is
quietly assuming a different test scenario, so they never have to collide.
·
The real world answer:
o
If you
actually press a very sharp, hard steel edge into a plastic/wood/composite
board with enough force, the board will mark.
o
If you
actually try to cut “most anything” (stone, glass, ceramic, hardened steel),
the knife will lose.
So: in a literal, physics-based
sense, you’re right—both claims cannot be absolutely true in all conditions.
But in the squishy world of advertising, they’re both “true enough” to survive
the fine print.
No comments:
Post a Comment